Thursday, July 16, 2009

The Dumb Pipe Paradox ― How open access networks build shareholder value

On more than one occasion, "natural monopoly" arguments have been used to obtain, and/or hold onto, a government granted monopoly, This is definitely true of access networks where the physical right-of-way to any specific real estate parcel is a limited resource, but the economics of what you put in it have changed over time. At one time it made sense to consider telephone service a natural monopoly. And for most of the twentieth century, telephone service was operated that way (think Bell System in the US and government run PTTs in most of the rest of the world). In the latter 20th century, cable TV became a second such monopoly. Today, it's increasingly clear that telephony and television are higher layer services, not inherently tied to the access network. Yet our laws and regulation have barely evolved ― each access network is still regulated as a different vertically integrated monopoly. And, managers in each business focus on preserving their historic monopoly even as market forces or government regulations force them to also offer Internet access.

So it's interesting to see solid economic analysis showing that access network shareholders would make more money if management was willing to open up their access networks, i.e. become "dumb pipes."

The first such argument I encountered was by Craig Moffett and Amelia Wong of Bernstein Research who wrote an interesting paper The Dumb Pipe Paradox, early in 2006. The original paper is not on line but I have some quotes here and there are some other comments here. Craig and Amelia were looking at Cable TV's hybrid fiber-coax networks and concluded that cable companies could make more return on investment if they were in the pure dumb pipes business.

More recently, I reported on a speech given by Benoît Felten of Yankee Group and Fiberevolution in which he argued that new fiber to the home (FTTH) investments could be paid back more rapidly if the FTTH network were open, i.e. offered to competitors at attractive wholesale rates.

Now Benoît has written a detailed report describing his findings. Although the report is for Yankee Group subscribers only, Benoît is also giving a webinar on the subject next Tuesday and that's open to all. Register here.

I particularly liked the polite suggestion near the end of Benoît's report:

Recommendations for Incumbents
• Re-examine your economic fundamentals in light of the FTTH business model. It’s irrational to cling to antiquated business practices if new approaches, no matter how disruptive, deliver better shareholder value.



Monday, March 09, 2009

Carrier-Grade: Five Nines, the Myth and the Reality

It's pretty interesting issue about so called "fine nines" concept. 



What is the hard fast requirement for Carrier-Grade?  Is “five-nines” or 99.999% up 
or 0.99999 available a hard, fast requirement of telecommunications or is it the 
telecommunications equivalent of an Urban Myth?
..
www.pipelinepub.com/0407/pdf/Article%204_Carrier%20Grade_LTC.pdf


Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Updates to the CCIE Lab and Written Exam Question Format and Scoring

Effective February 1, 2009, Cisco will introduce a new type of question format to CCIE Routing and Switching lab exams. In addition to the live configuration scenarios, candidates will be asked a series of four or five open-ended questions, on the computer screen, drawn from a pool of questions based on the material covered on the lab blueprint. No new topics are being added.


--- 

To increase the security & integrity of the CCIE R&S Lab exam, there will be a series of open-ended, short answer questions added to the lab exam and delivered online in all global lab locations. The addition of these questions does not change the lab exam blue-print, nor does it require time be added to the total exam time. At this point the questions are being added to the Routing and Switching lab; lab exams in other tracks will be announced in advance.

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Android G1 - more battery

The biggest problem with G1 is the battery so lets try with different one. I just ordered it.

This Innocell extended battery provides more than double the capacity of the standard battery. Even with heavy phone and data usage, this battery will keep your G1 charged and ready to go.
 
- 2600mAh - Up to 125% more capacity than the original
- Includes a replacement door with our soft-touch "rubberized" texture to improve grip
- High quality Japanese cells
- Extends the depth of your device by only 5mm
- Pair it with our Horizontal Innocase Leather
 for extra protections on the go**

*All battery claims are dependent upon usage patterns, network configuration and many other factors; actual results will vary.

** This 2600mAh Extended Battery is not compatible with Seidio Spring Clip holster.

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Palm with WebOS is comming